McCain, Iraq, and 100 Years of Stupidity

As we all know, John McCain (R - Warmongerville) has stated that a commitment of 100 years in Iraq would be just fine.  The media sunk its claws in on this one, before taking them out in a well timed exercise of "but what he really meant...", explaining that McCain is actually calling for a deployment much like what we currently have in Korea (or Japan...or Germany).

Leaving aside arguments about the merits of military deployments to Korea , there's a larger point that the media has generally ignored.  

An American presence in Iraq ---even as a peacekeeping force or simply in the same "rent-a-base" fashion we see around the world--- would act as free propaganda for al Qaeda and other terrorist groups.

As the initial American invasion of Iraq, based from Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf War, was one of the primary reasons for the instigation of anti-American terror, so too would a permanent force of Americans in Iraq act as a reason for violence, not just against our soldiers, but against Americans and American interests around the globe.  While our presence in Iraq might not be quite so contentious as it is in Saudi Arabia, home to Islam's holiest sites, we can hardly rely on al Qaeda to be so kind as to make that distinction.  

But this isn't about al Qaeda.  Terrorists will draw the line of their propaganda where they will, and I've little doubt that, if we had no forces anywhere in the Middle East, we'd remain a target for other reasons.  What this IS about is public opinion across the Middle East --- giving those inclined to hate us one less reason to do so, and those inclined to like us one more reason to do so.  It's about taking away one more thing that, when pointed to as evidence of American Imperialism and hate of Islam, seeps into the consciences of generations of children.  It's part of the slow battle not to defeat those who are terrorists, but to defeat a desire to commit acts of terror and violence among those who remain uncommitted to doing so and to slowly diminish the potential base or terror recruits.

The Iraq War is a disaster.  In terms of long term costs, however, even a peace-time mission in Iraq would be a potentially much larger disaster.  It would be a fundamental failure to learn from past mistakes.  John McCain clearly has not learned from those mistakes, and his election would send a critical message that we, the American people, are committed to a military presence that is offensive to the people of the Middle East.  That would be, I'm afraid, another disastrous mistake.



Display:


Re: McCain, Iraq, and 100 Years of Stupidity (none / 0)

I don't believe in not having troop presence in Iraq for a certain number of years .

Both of our candidates are closer to Mccain than they are letting on , John Mccain just has the courage to tell the voters where he actually stands.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Thu Apr 10, 2008 at 11:51:20 PM EST

Re: McCain, Iraq, and 100 Years of Stupidity (none / 0)

McCain's position is troops in Iraq forever. He says because we can't leave in disgrace/cave to terrorists/surrender we can't leave now. He also says that a peacetime troop presence in Iraq for 100, 10000, even 1000000 years is just fine with him. He never intends to leave, no matter what conditions transpire. Is that the guy you want to believe?


Proudly joining the legions of people and states that don't matter on May 20th.
by Obama Independent on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 12:23:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain, Iraq, and 100 Years of Stupidity (none / 0)

Our candidates position is to bring the war to a close as quickly and safely as possible...that may not be right away, it may take their entire term, but they have an endgame; no more combat troops in Iraq and they will work to make that happen by any means possible.

McCain's position is to keep doing what we've been doing as long as it takes to do it until he is satisfied with the "victory"

If it's your position that we need to stay there until Iraq is a free democracy and Muqtada al-Sadr is signing a treaty on a war ship in the Persian Gulf, then absolutely vote for John McCain.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 06:41:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Excellent diary. (none / 0)

A lot of good points. I'm really pleased to see people focusing on McCain. It's true, if the American people elect a Republican this year, it will send a very disturbing message to the rest of the world.


Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 01:03:43 AM EST

Re: Excellent diary. (none / 0)

Thanks.

I can't imagine why this angle hasn't been in the media.  


No way. No how. No McCain.
by freedom78 on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 01:05:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.